The Power of the Practice Value Insights Report: How Buyer Data Can Refine Your Valuation

In our own approach to financial services M&A, Growth Focus places a strong emphasis on buyer data. Our Practice Value Insights Report provides a comprehensive analysis of the real-time dynamics of the buyer market, helping us understand what buyers are truly willing to pay for. The insights derived from our National Buyer Survey are invaluable in refining business valuations and ensuring that sellers have the most accurate picture of their business’s worth.

By focusing on what buyers are willing to pay—rather than relying solely on abstract multiples—we create a much clearer picture of a business’s value. This approach also incorporates critical factors such as client retention, regulatory compliance, and the buyer’s ability to integrate the business post-sale.

When you’re contemplating selling your business, the most common question is: What is my business worth? While it seems like a straightforward question, the reality is far more nuanced. Business valuations are not an exact science. In fact, different experts may arrive at different figures for the same business, depending on the methodology and criteria they use.

Valuation in M&A typically relies on two primary methods: the market-based approach and the income-based approach. Both approaches are rooted in well-established financial metrics, yet they offer different perspectives on value. To understand the full picture, it’s essential to dive into the processes behind these approaches and consider the broader dynamics of the deal.

The Market Approach vs. Income-Based Approach

Valuers often apply the market approach and the income-based approach when determining the value of a business. Let’s break these down.

Market Approach: This approach is based on comparable transactions in the market. The valuer will look at similar businesses that have been bought or sold recently and apply multiples to your business’s revenue or profit. This approach is more commonly used for businesses with stable financials and fewer unique characteristics. However, the market approach has limitations. It doesn’t fully capture your business’s unique strengths or weaknesses and can be impacted by current market conditions.

Income-Based Approach: The income-based approach places a higher emphasis on the business’s future earnings potential. This method often uses multiples of EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization) or recurring revenue, which reflect the long-term sustainability of the business’s profitability. This approach is more suitable for larger, more established businesses with predictable cash flow, such as those in the financial services or accounting sectors. It requires a deeper understanding of the business’s operations and growth prospects.

The Fair Market Concept

When a valuer provides a business figure, they often apply the concept of “fair market value.” This term refers to a price at which a willing buyer and seller would transact, without either party being under duress. The buyer should not feel pressured to purchase, and the seller should not feel forced to sell. Essentially, fair market value reflects a scenario where both parties can walk away feeling comfortable with the terms.

The fair market concept is crucial because it accounts for the fact that businesses are rarely bought under ideal conditions. The pressure of deadlines, financial strain, or personal motivations can all impact the final price. However, if both parties are not under pressure, the valuation tends to be a more accurate reflection of the business’s true worth.

The Variability of Valuation Methods

It’s important to note that valuation methods can vary significantly depending on who’s doing the valuing. A business appraiser might provide a figure based on a combination of these approaches, but the weight assigned to each factor can differ. For example, a business with high recurring revenue may be valued more on a revenue multiple than a business with volatile earnings.

Additionally, the larger and more complex the business, the more likely it is that multiple valuation methods will be applied. A business with significant infrastructure and staffing will likely be valued using an income-based approach, particularly EBITDA multiples. However, for smaller businesses, a market-based approach may provide a better fit.

The Subjectivity Behind Valuation

Valuation is often seen as a purely objective, mathematical exercise, but the reality is more subjective. Valuers are not immune to biases, and market conditions play a significant role in determining the final figure. In today’s fluctuating economy, factors like interest rates, geopolitical risks, and even consumer sentiment can impact how a business is valued.

For instance, a buyer might be willing to pay more during a market boom, but during times of economic uncertainty, they may be more cautious. Similarly, changes in the regulatory environment or new technology developments could also impact valuations. For sellers, understanding the subjective nature of valuations is crucial, as it can help them adjust their expectations accordingly.

Final Thoughts: Understanding the Full Picture of Your Business’s Worth

Valuation is far from simple. While market-based approaches offer an overview, they can’t fully capture the intricacies of a financial services practice. The true value of a business lies in its long-term potential, client relationships, and ability to integrate into the buyer’s existing operations. By embracing a more comprehensive, data-driven approach to valuation, sellers can ensure they are getting the most accurate and realistic estimate of their business’s worth.

At Growth Focus, we advocate for a holistic, buyer-focused valuation that accounts for both tangible and intangible factors. Our National Buyer Survey, combined with real-time data, helps our clients gain clarity about their business’s value and make informed decisions when it comes time to sell.

References

1. DeMong, M., Harris, S., & Williams, R. (2019). The Impact of Financial Advisors on Private Company Transactions: A Study of 3,694 M&A Deals. University of Virginia.

2. Callahan, S. (2016). M&A Deal Flow and the Limitations of the Market Approach. Harvard Business Review.

👉 Considering a sale? We’ll help you structure a process that eliminates silent risks and maximises your outcome. Contact Growth Focus today to start the conversation.